Aranzadi 2006, Liberalism vs. Liberalism: Why are moral norms accepted? Becker's answer is that they are accepted because the monetary compensation exceeds the loss of utility.
BUT
Rothbard (1998, p.208-15):
- counterexample with revolution (rich will prefer to give their property to the poor because they will be compensated for it by not being killed by the poor)
richard thaler, 2000. From Homo Economicus to Homo Sapiens, Journal of Economic Perspectives-Volume 14, Number 1, Winter:
- My prediction is that the trend [complete rationality and mathematisation of behavior] will be reversed in favour of an approach in which the degree of rationality bestowed to the agents depends on the context being studied.
- (p.139) Homo Economicus will become more emotional, by which I mean that economists will devote more attention to the study of emotions
- (p.140) my prediction is that homo economicus will evolve into Homo Sapiens
- (p.140)One reason economics did not start out this way is that behavioural models are harder than tradtitional models. Building models of rationalm unemotional agents is easier that building models if quasi-rational emotional humans.
- (p.140) As economists become more sophistocated , their ability to incorporate the findings of other disciplines such as psyhchology improves
Economics will have to incorporate more works by other social sciences (such as Kahneman, Tversky cognitive psychology)
a pro pochopeni Klause (ale abyste si neukroutili hlavu, az to budete cist)
http://www.klaus.cz/klaus2/
No comments:
Post a Comment